Anthony Quinn 

Under the Influence: John Deakin, Photography and the Lure of Soho by Robin Muir – review

'It's surprising he didn't choke on his own venom' – the evil genius who captured the glory days of Soho. By Anthony Quinn
  
  

Francis Bacon photographed by John Deakin in 1952.
Detail of Francis Bacon photographed by John Deakin in 1952. Photograph: The Conde Nast Publications Ltd/John Deakin/Vogue. Click to enlarge Photograph: The Conde Nast Publications Ltd/John Deakin/Vogue

In the emollient climate of today's portrait photography John Deakin's work presents a bracing corrective. Deakin (1912-1972) photographed celebrities in his heyday, but he never cosseted or flattered them in the manner of a Mario Testino or an Annie Leibowitz. The faces of his sitters, caught in a curious hungover light, loom out at you, bemused, vulnerable, possibly guilty. He called them his "victims", and no wonder. A portrait he took of himself in the early 1950s is revealing, his pinched features and beady gaze suggesting a spiv or a blackmailer out of a Patrick Hamilton novel. "An evil genius," George Melly said of him, and "a vicious little drunk of such inventive malice that it's surprising he didn't choke on his own venom."

The inventiveness, if not the malice, is available for inspection in Under the Influence, curator Robin Muir's latest dip into the Deakin archive, which accompanies an exhibition currently showing at the Photographers' Gallery in London. It is a timely book in one way, for it offers glimpses of a Soho – Deakin's stamping ground of the late 40s and 50s – before its tragic fall into respectability. The shop-fronts, the alleyways, the graffiti on walls seize the eye as vividly as the company of artists and writers and boozers who posed for his unforgiving lens. Were he alive today one shudders to think what he would make of his beloved domain, stripped of its inimitable pungency, like a deodorised Camembert. Perhaps he would laugh – one imagines him having a smoker's rasping cackle – given what little value he placed on sentiment. He was estranged from his family for decades, claiming to have been born in Liverpool, "near the leper colony", an early indication of his fondness for tall tales. In fact he was born in Bebington, on the Wirral, near to where his father worked at Lever Brothers in Port Sunlight. He left school at 16, and kicked around Ireland and Spain before returning to England in the 30s; in London he found a rich American patron, Arthur Jeffress, to sponsor his fledgling career as a painter. His early work, influenced by Gauguin and Soutine, didn't set the Thames on fire, though the Observer conceded that he was "certainly earmarked for some sort of reputation".

Was he ever. During the war he worked for the Army Film and Photography Unit, dispatched to Cairo, Tripoli and Malta; the scenes he witnessed in the latter fed his ravenous eye for devastation and architectural ruin. He was typically facetious about his war experiences. Finding himself with the unit at El Alamein, he listened as Montgomery warned his men of the superior tank power ranged against them; the worried silence that ensued was broken by Deakin's stage-whispered question, "Do you think we're on the right side?"

The end of the war marks the moment when his career – and his legend – properly catches fire. Audrey Withers, editor of Vogue, was so impressed by his street photographs of Paris and Rome that she hired him as a staff photographer in 1947, and quickly regretted it. His offhand manner, his drinking, his indifference to "fashion" and his propensity for losing valuable equipment damaged an already dubious reputation. Withers eventually sacked him, complaining that he was "incapable of taking a good picture of a beautiful woman". (Not true: Gina Lollobrigida never looked lovelier than in his mid-50s portrait of her.) In fact, he would have the honour of being fired twice by Vogue, the second time in 1954, by which time he was riding high as court portraitist and jester to the leading lights of British art. Lucian Freud, Frank Auerbach, Michael Andrews, Keith Vaughan, Eduardo Paolozzi and John Minton all went before his camera, as did writers such as Dylan Thomas, Elizabeth Smart, Louis MacNeice, Colin MacInnes and Ken Tynan. Most famous of all was his close friend Francis Bacon. The photograph of him stripped to the waist, holding a split carcass of meat, is perhaps the defining image in the Deakin galère; if it didn't inspire Bacon's own tortured depictions of flesh and bone it surely anticipated them.

Bacon, whose face adorns the cover of Muir's first selection of Deakin's photographs from 1996, played an inadvertent role in salvaging the photographer's posthumous reputation. Deakin had pretty much drunk away the 60s, having more or less abandoned the camera in favour of painting. (There are ropey examples of his art in the current exhibition, which underline a truth: it's not the thing you're good at that obsesses you – it's the thing you long to be good at.) He died of lung disease in the Old Ship hotel at Brighton in May 1972 – another Hamilton echo – and his life's work might have gone with him were it not for the admirable foresight of his friend Bruce Bernard, Jeffrey's brother. Bernard visited Deakin's flat in Berwick Street, Soho, shortly after his death and retrieved from under the bed a large cache of photographs, scratched and knocked about in a way entirely typical of their late owner's carelessness. A further tranche of Deakinia was recovered from the floor of Bacon's chaotic studio, these smeared with paint and torn at the edges to lend them an accidental touch of bohemian squalor. Some of these prints, as Muir notes, help to plot the creative coordinates between the photographer and the painter. His shots of the model Henrietta Moraes and of Lucian Freud, for example, were later adopted by Bacon as "memory traces" for his paintings of them. He considered Deakin's photographs to be "the best since Nadar and Julia Margaret Cameron".

That verdict may be hard to challenge. However tatty some of these photographs look today, there can be no doubting Deakin's artful handling of composition and light, or the hours he spent in his darkroom getting the grain of his prints just right. Their impact is undiminished; if anything, it has been enhanced by the passage of years. Look at his weirdly unsettling shot of Freud in 1952 and you see something nobody else caught (Deakin described him as "a strange, fox-like person"); or the heartbreaking shot of poor John Minton, face caged in his hands as if he wants to make himself disappear; or George Dyer, another suicide, nervous and dapper on Old Compton Street, two fingers of one hand, touchingly, clasped by the other. You can see that shiftiness in many of his subjects, and one longs to know how Deakin, hovering before them with his camera, created such a mood of unease. The actor Paul Scofield recalled, after an encounter: "I remember thinking uncomfortably that he didn't like me." It seems quite possible that Deakin didn't like anyone very much – he just liked photographing them. This beautifully produced book testifies to a talent that still astonishes. Clapping it shut you will be struck by a powerful sense that when the glory days of Soho are remembered it will be largely through the dark-adapted eye of John Deakin.

• To order Under the Influence for £27.99 with free UK p&p call Guardian book service on 0330 333 6846 or go to guardianbookshop.co.uk.

 

Leave a Comment

Required fields are marked *

*

*