She’s the woman who has set Lit Twitter alight, or – as the Guardian can exclusively reveal! – the women who have. The Bougie London Literary Woman account (@BougieLitWoman), with 14,000 followers and counting, has delighted the bookish with its parody tweets of an archetypal culottes-wearing, jam-making BBC Radio 4-listening (and yes, probably Guardian-reading) type. Or, as the bio describes the persona: “A 20-something seabird adrift on the tides of London. Can be found devouring literature, swimming wild and scribbling.”
Recent examples include bons mots such as: “Have retreated to the coast for the year’s fallow week to commune with my Joan Baez records. “May I have this dance?” I ask the sea, but coyly she does not reply.”
And these:
Fans of the account include novelists such as Charlotte Mendelson; editors at British Vogue; multiple publishing PRs and bibliophiles UK-wide. The names of the authors remain unknown, although many fans have attempted to sleuth. Some, I am told, have guessed correctly – and been sworn to secrecy. The two women behind BLLW also mention a surprising number of suitors: “Which goes to show that even if you are an explicitly fictional, non-existent parody woman, you somehow still get DM slides from creepy men.”
The Bougie London Literary Woman character existed for a long time before her first online appearance, they tell me: “As long as we’ve been friends, we’ve always invented characters to amuse each other, and BLLW has existed between us for a few years now. We noticed the rise of a particular cadence people used to talk about culture and lifestyle online, ourselves included. The way we leave a sort of artful trail of cultural-capital breadcrumbs of ourselves all over the internet.”
Did they expect the account to be so popular? “It’s been a very nice surprise. It feels a bit like having given birth to a precocious, fully grown daughter. Or like channelling some sort of extremely rarefied spirit.”
The authors demur when asked to reveal any more about their true identities, which is probably a good thing, because it would ruin the character’s essence. Instead, here is an exclusive Guardian quickfire interview with BLLW herself:
What is the most overrated book? And the most underrated?
Conrad’s Heart of Darkness. Hartley’s The Shrimp and the Anemone.
Kindle or never?
The K word is a mot interdit in our household.
Handmade quilt or vintage floral blanket?
I am a collector of all things, but it is my cedar chest of linens that I would save in a fire. In summer I sleep under adapted French antique tablecloths that I buy by the sackload whenever I am in Lyon; in winter, I like the institutional sternness of a blanket.
Ladies’ pond or lido?
The ponds. There is no substitute for a swim truly thicketed with green; and one cannot nurture delusions of being the mysterious second wife in a 19th-century novel in Brockwell.
Vita or Virginia?
How could you bear to separate them, even in the hypothetical! But I suppose: Vita whenever I am out in a new pair of shoes; Virginia when, a few hours later, I am confronted with the agony that not a soul encountered has mustered a compliment for them.
Keats House or Freud museum?
Both! The perfect afternoon’s stimulation for the heart and then the mind, followed by a ramble up the Heath to the Spaniard’s Inn, to warm my cockles in the very place where Keats warmed his.
Smythson or Moleskine?
I buy all my stationery in Florence; English paper lacks a certain verve.
Which of the Cusk trilogy?
My heart belongs, invariably and contrarily, to The Bradshaw Variations.
Do you have any tips or advice for your beloved followers?
Carpe librum.